Reading James 2:18-20 with Anti-Donatist Eyes: Untangling Augustine's Exegetical Legacy
James 2:18-20 remains infamous for its textual and interpretive difficulties. This article proposes that our challenges result from replacing James's inherent prosopopoeia with Augustine's innovation of two different kinds of faith. The "types of faith" distinction, ubiquitous in...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Scholar's Press
2020
|
| Dans: |
Journal of Biblical literature
Année: 2020, Volume: 139, Numéro: 2, Pages: 385-407 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Donatus, von Karthago ca. -ca. 355
/ Dogmatique
/ Théologie des sacrements
/ Bibel. Jakobusbrief 2,18-20
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament NBA Théologie dogmatique |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | James 2:18-20 remains infamous for its textual and interpretive difficulties. This article proposes that our challenges result from replacing James's inherent prosopopoeia with Augustine's innovation of two different kinds of faith. The "types of faith" distinction, ubiquitous in modern commentaries, originated with Augustine's use of Jas 2:19 to demonize Donatists as outside the faith community. Augustine's polemical interpretation that ejected Donatists as false Christians was allowed by his deficient Vetus Latina (VL) text. I analyze these interpretations--dominating modern exegetical decisions--with their accompanying problems and suggest an alternative paradigm that ameliorates those perennial difficulties by remaining within the context of James's faith community. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1934-3876 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of Biblical literature
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/jbl.2020.0016 DOI: 10.15699/jbl.1392.2020.8 |