Revelation and the Unity of the Truth
In his assessment of Paul Tillichs theology, Dirk Martin Grube states that revelation pertains to knowledge about knowledge instead of knowledge about the world. This concept of revelation raises two interrelated questions: 1) Can revelation be restricted to an epistemological metalevel without conv...
Publié dans: | NTT |
---|---|
Auteur principal: | |
Collaborateurs: | |
Type de support: | Électronique Review |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Amsterdam University Press
[2020]
|
Dans: |
NTT
Année: 2020, Volume: 74, Numéro: 2, Pages: 123-137 |
Compte rendu de: | Offenbarung, absolute Wahrheit und interreligiöser Dialog (Berlin : De Gruyter, 2019) (Belt, Henk van den)
|
Classifications IxTheo: | KAJ Époque contemporaine KDD Église protestante NBB Révélation NBF Christologie VB Herméneutique; philosophie |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
propositional truth
B Dirk-Martin Grube B Revelation B Compte-rendu de lecture B faith and science B Paul Tillich B historicity of the resurrection |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | In his assessment of Paul Tillichs theology, Dirk Martin Grube states that revelation pertains to knowledge about knowledge instead of knowledge about the world. This concept of revelation raises two interrelated questions: 1) Can revelation be restricted to an epistemological metalevel without conveying propositional content?; 2) Does knowledge based on revelation potentially conflict with other forms of knowledge? This article denies the first and affirms the latter, thus arguing against Grubes thesis and uses the importance of the historicity of Jesus resurrection as a litmus test. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2590-3268 |
Référence: | Kritik in "Reply to Henk van den Belts and Rick Benjamins articles (2020)"
|
Contient: | Enthalten in: NTT
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5117/NTT2020.2.003.VAND |