Dualism or Paradox? A New ‘Light’ on the Gospel of John
Modern scholarship maintains the Gospel of John is dualistic. This view is uneasily held as there is a growing move to distance the gospel from the original history-of-religions concept of dualism that reached its peak in the mid-twentieth century with expectations of incipient Gnosticism in John. I...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
[2020]
|
In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 71, Issue: 1, Pages: 90-118 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
John
/ Dualism
/ Paradox
/ Light
/ Darkness
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1700346830 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210408142518.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200610s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jts/flz168 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1700346830 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1700346830 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1123737975 |0 (DE-627)877384835 |0 (DE-576)481913289 |4 aut |a Estes, Douglas |d 1972- | |
109 | |a Estes, Douglas 1972- |a Estes, Douglas C. 1972- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dualism or Paradox? A New ‘Light’ on the Gospel of John |
264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Modern scholarship maintains the Gospel of John is dualistic. This view is uneasily held as there is a growing move to distance the gospel from the original history-of-religions concept of dualism that reached its peak in the mid-twentieth century with expectations of incipient Gnosticism in John. Instead of further nuancing the dualistic-sounding ideas in John, this essay challenges directly the claim that John is dualistic—and it proposes that what is often understood to be a dualistic metaphysic is actually paradoxical language as part of the Gospel’s oral and literary language games. Starting with a survey of how dualism entered into the scholarly purview of John, the essay then turns to the meaning and function of paradox in the ancient world. Since scholars point to John’s ‘light’ and ‘darkness’ imagery as the most prominent example of dualism, this essay uses the paradox language of ‘light’ and ‘darkness’ as a test case to demonstrate how paradox, and not dualism, is a more accurate and historical descriptor for John’s communicative strategy. | ||
652 | |a HC | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4028700-2 |0 (DE-627)106277561 |0 (DE-576)208978895 |a Bibel |2 gnd |p Johannesevangelium |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4130223-0 |0 (DE-627)105704148 |0 (DE-576)209617152 |2 gnd |a Dualismus |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4044593-8 |0 (DE-627)106204904 |0 (DE-576)209061596 |2 gnd |a Paradoxon |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4035596-2 |0 (DE-627)106246852 |0 (DE-576)209013605 |2 gnd |a Licht |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4150867-1 |0 (DE-627)105550205 |0 (DE-576)209783508 |2 gnd |a Dunkelheit |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of theological studies |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899 |g 71(2020), 1, Seite 90-118 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341339555 |w (DE-600)2066662-7 |w (DE-576)098474553 |x 1477-4607 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:71 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:90-118 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/71/1/90/5717943 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flz168 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |
951 | |a AR | ||
BIB | |a 1 | ||
BIR | |a 04000000_04999999 |b biblesearch | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3685120727 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1700346830 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210408142518 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200610||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044136 |a HC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Darkness,Darkness,Dualism,Dualism,Dualism in art,Light,Light,Paradox,Paradoxes |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dualisme,Dualisme,Lumière,Lumière,Obscurité,Obscurité,Paradoxe |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dualismo,Dualismo,Luz,Luz,Oscuridad,Oscuridad,Tinieblas,Tinieblas,Tinieblas (Motivo),Tinieblas,Paradoxón |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Buio,Buio,Dualismo,Dualismo,Luce,Luce,Paradosso |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 二元论,二元论,光,光,悖论,诡局,吊诡,黑暗,昏暗 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 二元論,二元論,光,光,悖論,詭局,弔詭,黑暗,昏暗 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Dualismo,Dualismo,Escuridão,Escuridão,Trevas,Trevas,Trevas (Motivo),Trevas,Luz,Luz,Paradoxo |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Дуализм (мотив),Дуализм,Парадокс,Свет (мотив),Свет,Темнота (мотив),Темнота |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δυισμός <μοτίβο>,Δυισμός,Δυαδισμός,Δυαδισμός (μοτίβο),Παράδοξο,Σκοτάδι (μοτίβο),Σκοτάδι,Φως (μοτίβο),Φως |
SUB | |a BIB | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Johannesevangelium,Joh,John,Jn,Gv,Io,Johannesevangelium,J,Gospel of Saint John,Gospel of John,Evangelium secundum Johannem,Evangile de Jean,Vangelo secondo Giovanni,Il Vangelo secondo San Giovanni,Johannes-Evangelium,Das Evangelium Johannes,Svetoto evangelie ot Ioanna,Ka euanelio,Ka euanelio a Ioane,Evangelium nach Johannes,Inǧīl Yūḥanā , Doppelung,Dualität , Paradoxes,Paradoxie,Das Paradoxe , Sichtbares Licht |