Reshaping Jeremiah: Scribal strategies and the prophet like Moses
The prophet like Moses, announced in Deut. 18.15, is placed in a lineage of prophets and ends up as an announcer of Moses’ Torah (e.g. 2 Kgs. 17.13). Deut. 34.10-12 questions this idea by establishing Moses as the unsurpassable prophet. The view of the prophet like Moses as a link in a prophetic cha...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2020, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 575-593 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Deuteronomium 18,15
/ Bible. Deuteronomium 34,10-12
/ Apocrypha
/ Pseudepigrapha
/ Jeremiah
/ Prophet
/ Moses
/ Bible. Jeremia 32,16-25
/ New Covenant
|
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Bibel. Jeremia, 30,2
B prophet like Moses B Keywords Book of Jeremiah B Book of Jeremiah B Jeremiah B Bibel. Jeremia, 1,7cd.9d B Deuteronomy B Jer. Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The prophet like Moses, announced in Deut. 18.15, is placed in a lineage of prophets and ends up as an announcer of Moses’ Torah (e.g. 2 Kgs. 17.13). Deut. 34.10-12 questions this idea by establishing Moses as the unsurpassable prophet. The view of the prophet like Moses as a link in a prophetic chain changes accordingly. By means of three examples (Jer. 1.7cd.9d; 30.2; and 32.16-25), the article will show how the Book of Jeremiah develops the depiction of Jeremiah as the prophet like Moses in response to Deut. 34.10-12. The reshaping of Jeremiah can be ascribed to a scribal enterprise, aimed at creating a substitute for Moses, with the underlying aim of legitimising the promise of the new covenant (31.31-34). Unexpectedly, however, this text has been met with an underwhelming inner- and extra-biblical reception; the last paragraph will suggest a possible answer to what seems a curious paradox. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1476-6728 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089219862802 |