Are Literary Languages Artificial?: The Case of the Aramaic of the Zohar
Few studies have focused on the Aramaic of the Zohar, and to this day, only one of these presents a completed grammatical analysis. Scholars have dealt at large, however, with the question of whether the Aramaic of the Zohar is artificial or not. I briefly review the history of the literature around...
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | 電子 Article |
語言: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
出版: |
[2020]
|
In: |
Aramaic studies
Year: 2020, 卷: 18, 發布: 1, Pages: 124-145 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
亞拉姆語
/ Zohar
|
IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism |
Further subjects: | B
Linguistic variation
B dialect B literary language B Aramaic B Zohar B artificial language |
在線閱讀: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
總結: | Few studies have focused on the Aramaic of the Zohar, and to this day, only one of these presents a completed grammatical analysis. Scholars have dealt at large, however, with the question of whether the Aramaic of the Zohar is artificial or not. I briefly review the history of the literature around this question, then propose my own criteria to examine whether a language of a given text is indeed artificial. Finally, I put this methodology into practice, as I investigate the nature of Zoharic Aramaic by examining specific linguistic phenomena in the relevant corpus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-5227 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Aramaic studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455227-bja10002 |