Should Extinction be Forever? Restitution, Restoration, and Reviving Extinct Species
"De-extinction" projects propose to re-create or "resurrect" extinct species. Perhaps the most common justification offered for these projects is that humans have an obligation to make restitution to species we have eradicated. There are three versions of this argument for de-ext...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas
[2015]
|
In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 37, Issue: 2, Pages: 131-143 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | "De-extinction" projects propose to re-create or "resurrect" extinct species. Perhaps the most common justification offered for these projects is that humans have an obligation to make restitution to species we have eradicated. There are three versions of this argument for de-extinction—one individualistic, one concerned with species, and one that emphasizes ecological restoration—and all three fail to provide a compelling case for species revival. A general critique of de-extinction can be sketched that highlights how it can both facilitate inattentiveness to biological and ecological boundaries and foster a managerial mentality toward the natural world. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2153-7895 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Environmental ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics201537214 |