The Turn to Virtue in Climate Ethics: Wickedness and Goodness in the Anthropocene

Ethicists regularly turn to virtue in order to negotiate features of climate change that seem to overwhelm moral agency. Appeals to virtue in climate ethics differ by how they connect individual flourishing with collective responsibilities and by how they interpret Anthropocene relations. Difference...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jenkins, Willis 1975- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas [2016]
In: Environmental ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 38, Issue: 1, Pages: 77-96
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1698012403
003 DE-627
005 20200512093333.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200512s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/enviroethics20163816  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1698012403 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1698012403 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1047550040  |0 (DE-627)778542998  |0 (DE-576)40115159X  |4 aut  |a Jenkins, Willis  |d 1975- 
109 |a Jenkins, Willis 1975-  |a Jenkins, Willis J. 1975-  |a Jenkins, Willis Jackson 1975- 
245 1 4 |a The Turn to Virtue in Climate Ethics  |b Wickedness and Goodness in the Anthropocene 
264 1 |c [2016] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ethicists regularly turn to virtue in order to negotiate features of climate change that seem to overwhelm moral agency. Appeals to virtue in climate ethics differ by how they connect individual flourishing with collective responsibilities and by how they interpret Anthropocene relations. Differences between accounts of climate virtue help critique proposals to reframe global ecological problems in terms of resilience and planetary stewardship, the intelligibility of which depends on connecting what would be good for the species with what would be good for an individual life. A pragmatic way of establishing that connection may need a strong role for respect of nature. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Environmental ethics  |d Denton, Tex. : Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas, 1979  |g 38(2016), 1, Seite 77-96  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341349410  |w (DE-600)2067662-1  |w (DE-576)459254057  |x 2153-7895  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:77-96 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=enviroethics&id=enviroethics_2016_0038_0001_0077_0096  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20163816  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3664835794 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1698012403 
LOK |0 005 20200512093113 
LOK |0 008 200512||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw