The Turn to Virtue in Climate Ethics: Wickedness and Goodness in the Anthropocene
Ethicists regularly turn to virtue in order to negotiate features of climate change that seem to overwhelm moral agency. Appeals to virtue in climate ethics differ by how they connect individual flourishing with collective responsibilities and by how they interpret Anthropocene relations. Difference...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas
[2016]
|
In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2016, Volume: 38, Issue: 1, Pages: 77-96 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1698012403 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20200512093333.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200512s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/enviroethics20163816 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1698012403 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1698012403 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1047550040 |0 (DE-627)778542998 |0 (DE-576)40115159X |4 aut |a Jenkins, Willis |d 1975- | |
109 | |a Jenkins, Willis 1975- |a Jenkins, Willis J. 1975- |a Jenkins, Willis Jackson 1975- | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Turn to Virtue in Climate Ethics |b Wickedness and Goodness in the Anthropocene |
264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Ethicists regularly turn to virtue in order to negotiate features of climate change that seem to overwhelm moral agency. Appeals to virtue in climate ethics differ by how they connect individual flourishing with collective responsibilities and by how they interpret Anthropocene relations. Differences between accounts of climate virtue help critique proposals to reframe global ecological problems in terms of resilience and planetary stewardship, the intelligibility of which depends on connecting what would be good for the species with what would be good for an individual life. A pragmatic way of establishing that connection may need a strong role for respect of nature. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental ethics |d Denton, Tex. : Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas, 1979 |g 38(2016), 1, Seite 77-96 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341349410 |w (DE-600)2067662-1 |w (DE-576)459254057 |x 2153-7895 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:77-96 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=enviroethics&id=enviroethics_2016_0038_0001_0077_0096 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20163816 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3664835794 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1698012403 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20200512093113 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200512||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |