Kant, Chakrabarty, and the Crises of the Anthropocene
Dipesh Chakrabarty has identified Immanuel Kant's distinction between the human's moral and animal dimensions as an underlying source of the failure of the humanities to respond to the ecological crises of the Anthropocene. Although relevant for the environmental humanities generally, Chak...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas
[2019]
|
| In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 41, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-67 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1697839436 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200511141234.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200511s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/enviroethics20194115 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1697839436 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1697839436 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Baumeister, David |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Baumeister, David | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kant, Chakrabarty, and the Crises of the Anthropocene |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Dipesh Chakrabarty has identified Immanuel Kant's distinction between the human's moral and animal dimensions as an underlying source of the failure of the humanities to respond to the ecological crises of the Anthropocene. Although relevant for the environmental humanities generally, Chakrabarty's critique is especially germane to contemporary environmental philosophy. It shows how the reality of anthropogenic climate change renders central aspects of Kant's influential conception of human nature untenable. While closer examination of Kant's writings corroborates the core of Chakrabarty's reading, there nonetheless remain positive resources in Kant's philosophy for contemporary environmental thinking, for, although Kant does regard the human's moral and animal dimensions as conceptually separable, he also understands them to be inextricably bound within the nature of human beings. Attending to the interplay between these Kantian commitments, a new critical insight into one of the basic tensions of the Anthropocene era can be attained. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental ethics |d Denton, Tex. : Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas, 1979 |g 41(2019), 1, Seite 53-67 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341349410 |w (DE-600)2067662-1 |w (DE-576)459254057 |x 2153-7895 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:53-67 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.pdcnet.org/oom/service?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=&rft.imuse_id=enviroethics_2019_0041_0001_0053_0067&svc_id=info:www.pdcnet.org/collection |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20194115 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3664639499 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1697839436 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200511124322 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200511||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||