Moral Deference, Moral Assertion, and Pragmatics

In this paper, I offer a novel defense of moderate pessimism about moral deference, i.e., the view that we have pro tanto reason to avoid moral deference. I argue that moral deference fails to give us the epistemic credentials to satisfy plausible norms of moral assertion. I then argue that moral as...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lewis, Max (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: [2020]
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2020, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-22
IxTheo Classification:NCA Ethics
VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy
Further subjects:B Moral deference
B Moral testimony
B Moral assertion
B moral epistemology
B Pragmatics
Online Access: Volltext (Publisher)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1694953408
003 DE-627
005 20250313145555.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200420s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-020-10065-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1694953408 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1694953408 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lewis, Max  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Moral Deference, Moral Assertion, and Pragmatics 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper, I offer a novel defense of moderate pessimism about moral deference, i.e., the view that we have pro tanto reason to avoid moral deference. I argue that moral deference fails to give us the epistemic credentials to satisfy plausible norms of moral assertion. I then argue that moral assertions made solely on the basis of deferential moral beliefs violate a plausible epistemic and moral norm against withholding information that one knows, has evidence, or ought to believe will importantly affect another person's deliberation. Finally, I argue that not only does moral deference fail to put the audience in a good epistemic position it also puts the audience in a bad epistemic and moral position. First, there is a tight connection between outright believing something and being disposed to assert it and so deferential moral beliefs often motivate people to assert something that they don't have the epistemic credentials to properly assertion. Second, there will often be moral reasons to make assertions—even based on deferential moral beliefs. These assertions, while all-things-considered permissible, will be epistemic impermissible and involve violating a moral norm. 
601 |a Pragmatik 
650 4 |a Moral assertion 
650 4 |a Moral deference 
650 4 |a moral epistemology 
650 4 |a Moral testimony 
650 4 |a Pragmatics 
652 |a NCA:VB 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 23(2020), 1, Seite 5-22  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:5-22 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10065-4  |x Verlag  |7 1 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3626974715 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1694953408 
LOK |0 005 20250313145555 
LOK |0 008 200420||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205381X  |a VB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 939   |a 20-04-20  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL