Politics in the Service of Society: A Response to My Interlocutors
This article is a response to Hauerwas's, O'Donovan's and Muir's engagements with Christ and the Common Life. Three distinctions that operate in the book are clarified, namely that between formal and informal politics, bottom-up forms of democratic politics and top-down forms of...
| 發表在: | Studies in Christian ethics |
|---|---|
| Subtitles: | A Symposium on Luke Bretherton’s Christ and the Common Life : Political Theology and the Case for Democracy |
| 主要作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Sage
[2019]
|
| In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CG Christianity and Politics NCD Political ethics ZC Politics in general |
| Further subjects: | B
public-private distinction
B Law B Authority B Democracy B statecraft B Politics |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| 總結: | This article is a response to Hauerwas's, O'Donovan's and Muir's engagements with Christ and the Common Life. Three distinctions that operate in the book are clarified, namely that between formal and informal politics, bottom-up forms of democratic politics and top-down forms of statecraft, and social and political relations. In setting these out, the distinction between public and private is critiqued and two, interrelated moves made in the book are defended. First, that democratic politics precedes and sustains a liberal polity. And second, that human law and the state should serve the antecedent and superordinate good of association. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
| Reference: | Kritik von "On God and Democracy (2020)"
Kritik von "The Professional Politician and the Activist (2020)" Kritik von "Power in Black and Pentecostal (2020)" |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946819897593 |