Politics in the Service of Society: A Response to My Interlocutors
This article is a response to Hauerwas's, O'Donovan's and Muir's engagements with Christ and the Common Life. Three distinctions that operate in the book are clarified, namely that between formal and informal politics, bottom-up forms of democratic politics and top-down forms of...
Опубликовано в: : | Studies in Christian ethics |
---|---|
Другие заглавия: | A Symposium on Luke Bretherton’s Christ and the Common Life : Political Theology and the Case for Democracy |
Главный автор: | |
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Sage
[2019]
|
В: |
Studies in Christian ethics
|
Индексация IxTheo: | CG Христианство и политика NCD Политическая этика ZC Общая политика |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
public-private distinction
B Law B Authority B Democracy B statecraft B Politics |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Итог: | This article is a response to Hauerwas's, O'Donovan's and Muir's engagements with Christ and the Common Life. Three distinctions that operate in the book are clarified, namely that between formal and informal politics, bottom-up forms of democratic politics and top-down forms of statecraft, and social and political relations. In setting these out, the distinction between public and private is critiqued and two, interrelated moves made in the book are defended. First, that democratic politics precedes and sustains a liberal polity. And second, that human law and the state should serve the antecedent and superordinate good of association. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
Reference: | Kritik von "On God and Democracy (2020)"
Kritik von "The Professional Politician and the Activist (2020)" Kritik von "Power in Black and Pentecostal (2020)" |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946819897593 |