Politics in the Service of Society: A Response to My Interlocutors
This article is a response to Hauerwas's, O'Donovan's and Muir's engagements with Christ and the Common Life. Three distinctions that operate in the book are clarified, namely that between formal and informal politics, bottom-up forms of democratic politics and top-down forms of...
Pubblicato in: | Studies in Christian ethics |
---|---|
Altri titoli: | A Symposium on Luke Bretherton’s Christ and the Common Life : Political Theology and the Case for Democracy |
Autore principale: | |
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Sage
[2019]
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
|
Notazioni IxTheo: | CG Cristianesimo e politica NCD Etica politica ZC Politica generale |
Altre parole chiave: | B
public-private distinction
B Law B Authority B Democracy B statecraft B Politics |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Riepilogo: | This article is a response to Hauerwas's, O'Donovan's and Muir's engagements with Christ and the Common Life. Three distinctions that operate in the book are clarified, namely that between formal and informal politics, bottom-up forms of democratic politics and top-down forms of statecraft, and social and political relations. In setting these out, the distinction between public and private is critiqued and two, interrelated moves made in the book are defended. First, that democratic politics precedes and sustains a liberal polity. And second, that human law and the state should serve the antecedent and superordinate good of association. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-9468 |
Riferimento: | Kritik von "On God and Democracy (2020)"
Kritik von "The Professional Politician and the Activist (2020)" Kritik von "Power in Black and Pentecostal (2020)" |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Studies in Christian ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0953946819897593 |