The hittite assembly

It has been widely held that during the earliest period of Hittite history the king was elected by the nobility, meeting in assembly for this purpose. Examination of the available attestations of the two Hittite words for political assembly, panku- and tuliya-, which differ only in their syntactic e...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Journal of the American Oriental Society
Auteur principal: Beckman, Gary M. 1948- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: American Oriental Society [Jul. - Oct., 1982]
Dans: Journal of the American Oriental Society
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Hittites / Substantif / Prince / Roi / Noblesse / Monarchie / Adjectif / Héritage (Personne) / Fils
Classifications IxTheo:TC Époque pré-chrétienne
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:It has been widely held that during the earliest period of Hittite history the king was elected by the nobility, meeting in assembly for this purpose. Examination of the available attestations of the two Hittite words for political assembly, panku- and tuliya-, which differ only in their syntactic employment, demonstrates that the Hittite assembly was not the gathering of a class, but rather primarily a judicial body, subject even in this area to the will of the monarch. It is further suggested that this assembly was composed of the members of the higher state bureaucracy, and not of the nobility per se, although the actual relationship between the two groups remains to be elucidated. No evidence for an elective system of kingship is found.
ISSN:2169-2289
Contient:Enthalten in: American Oriental Society, Journal of the American Oriental Society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/602295