Mapping Pluto's Republic: Cognitive and Epistemological Reflections on Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem

The presence of fringe and debatable methods and theories is widespread in the academia, excluding practically no discipline. Since theoretical reliability, epistemic warrant and empirical support are contentious issues, the demarcation between science and pseudoscience remains highly controversial,...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Ambasciano, Leonardo (Autore)
Altri autori: Pigliucci, Massimo 1964- (Antecedente bibliografico) ; Boudry, Maarten (Antecedente bibliografico)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Review
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2015]
In: Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Anno: 2015, Volume: 3, Fascicolo: 2, Pagine: 183-205
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Scienza <motivo> / Pseudoscienza / Distinzione / Storia delle religioni (Disciplina) / Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
Notazioni IxTheo:AA Scienze religiose
AE Psicologia delle religioni
VA Filosofia
Altre parole chiave:B Cognitive Science
B Critical Thinking
B super-natural / paranormal
B philosophy of science
B Pseudoscience
B Recensione
B Demarcation
Accesso online: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 169414514X
003 DE-627
005 20231113155741.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200406s2015 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1558/jcsr.27091  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)169414514X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP169414514X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1076044395  |0 (DE-627)834213478  |0 (DE-576)398252939  |4 aut  |a Ambasciano, Leonardo 
109 |a Ambasciano, Leonardo 
245 1 0 |a Mapping Pluto's Republic  |b Cognitive and Epistemological Reflections on Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem 
264 1 |c [2015] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The presence of fringe and debatable methods and theories is widespread in the academia, excluding practically no discipline. Since theoretical reliability, epistemic warrant and empirical support are contentious issues, the demarcation between science and pseudoscience remains highly controversial, especially in the Humanities. However, a renewed interest in the demarcation problem holds much promise to tackle the underlying methodological and epistemological questions. This review essay briefly deals with the historiographical resilience of pseudoscience and the fascination which psi phenomena in the academic history of religion in the light of Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry's recently co-edited book, entitled Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2013). A detailed review of Pigliucci and Boudry's volume is also provided. 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Cognitive Science 
650 4 |a Critical Thinking 
650 4 |a Demarcation 
650 4 |a paranormal/super-natural 
650 4 |a philosophy of science 
650 4 |a Pseudoscience 
652 |a AA:AE:VA 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4066562-8  |0 (DE-627)104393998  |0 (DE-576)209165138  |2 gnd  |a Wissenschaft 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4278343-4  |0 (DE-627)104410647  |0 (DE-576)210734876  |2 gnd  |a Pseudowissenschaft 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4187095-5  |0 (DE-627)105274798  |0 (DE-576)210043555  |2 gnd  |a Unterscheidung 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4177739-6  |0 (DE-627)104674296  |0 (DE-576)209979801  |2 gnd  |a Religionsgeschichte  |g Fach 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)1153645505  |0 (DE-627)1015151884  |0 (DE-576)500375216  |2 gnd  |a Kognitive Religionswissenschaft 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |0 (DE-588)13235053X  |0 (DE-627)521535832  |0 (DE-576)179162276  |4 ant  |a Pigliucci, Massimo  |d 1964- 
700 1 |a Boudry, Maarten  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal for the cognitive science of religion  |d Sheffield : Equinox Publ., 2013  |g 3(2015), 2, Seite 183-205  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)731338804  |w (DE-600)2693637-9  |w (DE-576)377157910  |x 2049-7563  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:3  |g year:2015  |g number:2  |g pages:183-205 
856 4 0 |u https://www.equinoxpub.com/journals/index.php/JCSR/article/view/27091  |x Resolving-System  |7 1 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.27091  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3619424101 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 169414514X 
LOK |0 005 20230622104324 
LOK |0 008 200406||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042966  |a AA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043024  |a AE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 939   |a 06-04-20  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Distinction,Discrimination,Pseudo-science,Science,Science,Science in art 
STB 0 0 |a Distinction,Pseudoscience,Science,Science 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencia,Ciencia,Ciencias,Distinción,Pseudo-ciencia 
STD 0 0 |a Distinzione,Discernimento,Discernimento,Pseudoscienza,Scienza <motivo>,Scienza,Sapere,Sapere,Sapere (motivo),Sapere 
STE 0 0 |a 区别,分别,科学,科学,学科,学科 
STF 0 0 |a 伪科学,區別,分別,科學,科學,學科,學科 
STG 0 0 |a Ciência,Ciência,Distinção,Pseudo-ciência 
STH 0 0 |a Наука (мотив),Наука,Псевдонаука,Распознавание,Дифференциация (философия) 
STI 0 0 |a Διάκριση,Επιστήμη (μοτίβο),Επιστήμη,Ψευδοεπιστήμη 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Wissenschaften,Science,Bürgerliche Wissenschaft,Wissenschaften , Distinktion , Cognitive science of religion 

Documenti analoghi

espandi