Der irdische Jesus und die Praxisbedeutung der Christologie
As high Christology often appears incompatible with church practice, the present essay analyses the most prominent Christological concepts promulgated since H. S. Reimarus under the keywords of the historical Jesus (D. F. Strauß), the kerygmatic Christ (M. Kähler) and, most recently, the ear...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
[2017]
|
| In: |
Evangelische Theologie
Year: 2017, Volume: 77, Issue: 3, Pages: 228-241 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Christology
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBF Christology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | As high Christology often appears incompatible with church practice, the present essay analyses the most prominent Christological concepts promulgated since H. S. Reimarus under the keywords of the historical Jesus (D. F. Strauß), the kerygmatic Christ (M. Kähler) and, most recently, the earthly Jesus (J. Schröter), all promising to give orientation for the entirety of theological subjects and church practice (I.). In combination with theories of memory (as proposed by J. Assmann), especially the earthly Jesus seems to be influential today but, in view of the problems of posttruth (English word of the year 2016), to which prominent theories of memory do not offer any effective remedy, also in need of correction (II.). Finally the essay reconstructs the concept of an earthly Jesus as developed by Hans-Georg Geyer (1929-1999) of Göttingen, offering the task of theological commemoration over against theories of (collective) memory (III.). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2198-0470 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Evangelische Theologie
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14315/evth-2017-0308 |