Who Violates The Principles of Political Liberalism?: Religion, Restraint, and the Decision to Reject Same-Sex Marriage

Recent debates in political theory have seen political liberals advocate and defend a doctrine of restraint, according to which citizens may not rely solely on religious reasons when supporting their favored public policies. This debate notwithstanding, very rarely have social scientists assessed th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Beyerlein, Kraig (Author) ; Eberle, Christopher J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2014]
In: Politics and religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 240-264
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1693401738
003 DE-627
005 20230810115640.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200327s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S1755048314000297  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1693401738 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1693401738 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1224629531  |0 (DE-627)1744186944  |4 aut  |a Beyerlein, Kraig 
109 |a Beyerlein, Kraig 
245 1 0 |a Who Violates The Principles of Political Liberalism?  |b Religion, Restraint, and the Decision to Reject Same-Sex Marriage 
264 1 |c [2014] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recent debates in political theory have seen political liberals advocate and defend a doctrine of restraint, according to which citizens may not rely solely on religious reasons when supporting their favored public policies. This debate notwithstanding, very rarely have social scientists assessed the extent to which citizens actually violate this doctrine. This article evaluates the "political decision-making" model of political liberalism. Data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults are used to test this model for legalization of same-sex marriage. Our analyses show that while only a very small percentage of U.S. support this policy solely on the basis of their religious convictions, roughly a quarter oppose it for religious reasons alone. Furthermore, we find that higher levels of religious service attendance and importance of religious faith as well as affiliation with evangelical and black Protestantism significantly increase the likelihood of same-sex marriage opposition entirely on religious grounds. 
601 |a Religion 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1120740908  |0 (DE-627)873689976  |0 (DE-576)480513600  |4 aut  |a Eberle, Christopher J. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Politics and religion  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008  |g 7(2014), 2, Seite 240-264  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)560846134  |w (DE-600)2417736-2  |w (DE-576)29433923X  |x 1755-0491  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:240-264 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-religion/article/who-violates-the-principles-of-political-liberalism-religion-restraint-and-the-decision-to-reject-samesex-marriage/A77F33F3E5F9A7EF1EB49FE3759E4B31  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048314000297  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 7  |j 2014  |e 2  |h 240-264 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3614525198 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1693401738 
LOK |0 005 20200327093822 
LOK |0 008 200327||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL