Sin or Slim?: Christian morality and the politics of personal choice in a secular commercial weight loss setting

Is fat a sin? Popular ‘knowledge' about obesity which frames fat as an avoidable behavioural condition would certainly suggest it can be blamed on the fat person. Discourses of health reproduced within public policy and media reporting assist in the pathologization of fat bodies, insisting that...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Fieldwork in religion
Autor principal: Bacon, Hannah 1978- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Equinox [2013]
En: Fieldwork in religion
Otras palabras clave:B Syn / sin
B Choice
B Morality
B fat
B weight loss
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Descripción
Sumario:Is fat a sin? Popular ‘knowledge' about obesity which frames fat as an avoidable behavioural condition would certainly suggest it can be blamed on the fat person. Discourses of health reproduced within public policy and media reporting assist in the pathologization of fat bodies, insisting that fat is the result of unhealthy lifestyle choices. It is, however, not simply medical interpretations of fat that facilitate this moral discourse. Religion also provides an important source of moral judgment. This paper draws on my qualitative research inside a UK secular, commercial slimming group to consider how the Christian moral language of sin functions within this setting to construct a politics of choice that holds the dieter personally responsible for her fat. Interpreting weight loss and weight gain as a measure of moral character, this theological language assists in the operation of ‘normative conformity', conforming women's bodies to cultural knowledge about fat.
ISSN:1743-0623
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Fieldwork in religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1558/firn.v8i1.92