RT Article
T1 Christians as Levites: Rethinking Early Christian Attitudes toward War and Bloodshed via Origen, Tertullian, and Augustine
JF Harvard theological review
VO 112
IS 4
SP 491
OP 516
A1 Weiss, Daniel H. 1957-
LA English
PB Cambridge Univ. Press
YR 2019
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1690247797
AB This article seeks to break the scholarly deadlock regarding attitudes toward war and bloodshed held by early Christian thinkers. I argue that, whereas previous studies have attempted to fit early Christian stances into one or another "unitary-ethic" framework, the historical-textual data can be best accounted for by positing that many early Christian writers held to a "dual-ethic" orientation. In the latter, certain actions would be viewed as forbidden for Christians but as legitimate for non-Christians in the Roman Empire. Moreover, this dual-ethic stance can be further illuminated by viewing it in connection with the portrayal in the Hebrew Bible of the relation between Levites and the other Israelite tribes. This framing enables us to gain a clearer understanding not only of writers like Origen and Tertullian, who upheld Christian nonviolence while simultaneously praising Roman imperial military activities, but also of writers such as Augustine, whose theological-ethical framework indicates a strong assumption of a dual-ethic stance in his patristic predecessors.
K1 Augustine
K1 Levites
K1 Origen
K1 Tertullian
K1 Just War
K1 Pacifism
DO 10.1017/S0017816019000257