The Priority of Public Reasons and Religious Forms of Life in Constitutional Democracies
In this essay I address the difficult question of how citizens with conflicting religious and secular views can fulfill the democratic obligation of justifying the imposition of coercive policies to others with reasons that they can also accept. After discussing the difficulties of proposals that ei...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2019]
|
| In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Pages: 45-60 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Democracy
/ Political attitude
/ Religiosity
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1690222115 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409135115.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200218s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.24204/ejpr.v11i4.3036 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1690222115 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1690222115 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)143791184 |0 (DE-627)654724881 |0 (DE-576)172142202 |4 aut |a Lafont, Cristina |d 1963- | |
| 109 | |a Lafont, Cristina 1963- |a Lafont Hurtado, Cristina 1963- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Priority of Public Reasons and Religious Forms of Life in Constitutional Democracies |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this essay I address the difficult question of how citizens with conflicting religious and secular views can fulfill the democratic obligation of justifying the imposition of coercive policies to others with reasons that they can also accept. After discussing the difficulties of proposals that either exclude religious beliefs from public deliberation or include them without any restrictions, I argue instead for a policy of mutual accountability that imposes the same deliberative rights and obligations on all democratic citizens. The main advantage of this proposal is that it recognizes the right of all democratic citizens to adopt their own cognitive stance (whether religious or secular) in political deliberation in the public sphere without giving up on the democratic obligation to provide reasons acceptable to everyone to justify coercive policies with which all citizens must comply. | ||
| 652 | |a AB:AD | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4011413-2 |0 (DE-627)106352873 |0 (DE-576)208893415 |2 gnd |a Demokratie |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4076217-8 |0 (DE-627)106083422 |0 (DE-576)209201207 |2 gnd |a Politische Einstellung |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049428-7 |0 (DE-627)10618704X |0 (DE-576)209082011 |2 gnd |a Religiosität |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal for philosophy of religion |d Innsbruck : University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, 2009 |g 11(2019), 4, Seite 45-60 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718600770 |w (DE-600)2659606-4 |w (DE-576)477533728 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2019 |g number:4 |g pages:45-60 |
| 856 | |u https://philosophy-of-religion.eu/index.php/ejpr/article/download/3036/2450 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://webapp.uibk.ac.at/ojs2/index.php/EJPR/article/view/3036 |x Resolving-System |z KW |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i4.3036 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3596286190 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1690222115 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200609133123 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-02-28#35A3A33DCB0DA95ABF017D614FA73FAB0BF00D89 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Democracy,Democracy,Political attitude,Attitude,Political orientation,Religiosity |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Démocratie,Démocratie,Position politique,Religiosité |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Democracia,Democracia,Posición política,Religiosidad |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Democrazia,Democrazia,Orientamento politico,Religiosità |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教性,政治立场,政治观点,政治态度,民主,民主,民主主义,民主制度,民主主义,民主制度 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教性,政治立場,政治觀點,政治態度,民主,民主,民主主義,民主制度,民主主義,民主制度 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Democracia,Democracia,Posição política,Religiosidade |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Демократия (мотив),Демократия,Политическая позиция,Религиозность |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δημοκρατία (μοτίβο),Δημοκρατία,Θρησκευτικότητα,Πολιτική στάση |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Volksherrschaft,Demokratischer Staat , Einstellung,Politische Orientierung,Politische Meinung,Politische Überzeugung , Religiösität,Religiösität |