The (In)authenticity of 1 Thessalonians 2.13-16: A Review of Arguments
This article critically reviews the arguments for and against the view that 1 Thess. 2.13-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation. It starts with the four arguments that are forwarded to promote the view that it is an interpolation: form-critical/literary, grammatical/syntactical, historical, and theolog...
| Published in: | Currents in biblical research |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2019]
|
| In: |
Currents in biblical research
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Thessalonicherbrief 1. 2,13-16
/ Authenticity
/ Interpolation
/ Polemics
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Bible. Thessalonicherbrief 1. 2,13-16
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article critically reviews the arguments for and against the view that 1 Thess. 2.13-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation. It starts with the four arguments that are forwarded to promote the view that it is an interpolation: form-critical/literary, grammatical/syntactical, historical, and theological. After this, a briefer second section outlines the four arguments defending the authenticity of the verses: textual, contextual, traditional, and rhetorical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5200 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Currents in biblical research
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/1476993X19860671 |