Power, ideology, and women's ordination: Discursive strategies in three Roman Catholic documents

This article analyzes through a linguistic lens three official documents of the Roman Catholic Church on women's ordination; it also identifies various discursive tactics utilized by text creators to reinforce gender hierarchy within the Church. Drawing from Fairclough's three dimensional...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Kim, Eun-Young Julia (Auteur) ; Matiko, Beverly J. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage [2019]
Dans: Critical research on religion
Année: 2019, Volume: 7, Numéro: 3, Pages: 237-256
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Inter insigniores / Johannes Paul, II., Pape 1920-2005, Ordinatio sacerdotalis / Église catholique / Femme / Ordre <sacrement> / Rôle de genre / Pouvoir / Hiérarchie
Classifications IxTheo:AD Sociologie des religions
CH Christianisme et société
KDB Église catholique romaine
Sujets non-standardisés:B Women's Ordination
B Critical Discourse Analysis
B Catholic Church
B Women priests
B Inter Insigniores
B Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:This article analyzes through a linguistic lens three official documents of the Roman Catholic Church on women's ordination; it also identifies various discursive tactics utilized by text creators to reinforce gender hierarchy within the Church. Drawing from Fairclough's three dimensional discourse framework, we examine the ideological message embedded in the linguistic features and the role each text plays within a matrix of power relations. Through close readings of Inter Insigniores: On the Question of Admission of Women to the Ministerial Priesthood, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis of John Paul II, and Women and the Priesthood, we demonstrate how discourse analysis can serve as a useful tool for identifying logical fallacies, inconsistencies, dilemmas, and manipulative tactics in religious discourses.
ISSN:2050-3040
Contient:Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/2050303219874375