Recognitio, approbatio, confirmatio
The reform carried out by m.p. Magnum principium reveals the importance of pointing out with clarity the specificity of the concepts of recognitio, approbatio and confirmatio, which within the Canon Law system, realize with various juridical implications and diverse ecclesiological relevance, effec...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Monitor Ecclesiasticus
[2017]
|
| In: |
Monitor ecclesiasticus
Year: 2017, Volume: 132, Issue: 1, Pages: 265-286 |
| Further subjects: | B
Authority
B Relationship B Judgment B Auditing |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1688970843 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211110165410.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200130s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||ita c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1688970843 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1688970843 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ita | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1074104595 |0 (DE-627)830238298 |0 (DE-576)435567810 |4 aut |a Kouveglo, Émile |d 1977- | |
| 109 | |a Kouveglo, Émile 1977- |a Kouveglo, Émile Georges 1977- |a Kouveglo, Emile Georges 1977- |a Kouveglo, Émile G. 1977- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Recognitio, approbatio, confirmatio |c Emile Kouveglo |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The reform carried out by m.p. Magnum principium reveals the importance of pointing out with clarity the specificity of the concepts of recognitio, approbatio and confirmatio, which within the Canon Law system, realize with various juridical implications and diverse ecclesiological relevance, effective spaces of relation and interaction, sometimes even of a hierarchical character. The present study aims at identifying some fictional criteria of worthy distinction. Specifically, it intends to make clear a possible juridical coherence on the use of these institutions and their respective juridical effects in the field of canonical administrative law. The analysis adds, where it seems useful, some comparative indications in relation to other systems, integrating them in the light of proper ecclesiological references of Canon Law system and the peculiarities of its juridical experience. All this would ensure the acceptance of recognatio, approbatio and confirmatio in a constructive relational perspective, in which ecclesial subjects often with different nature or different hierarchical level cooperate for the same act, with various responsibilities. | ||
| 601 | |a Approbation | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4003990-0 |0 (DE-627)106388134 |0 (DE-576)208853413 |a Autorität |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4187267-8 |0 (DE-627)104657618 |0 (DE-576)210044691 |a Urteilskraft |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4049673-9 |0 (DE-627)106186124 |0 (DE-576)209083026 |a Revision |2 gnd |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4145198-3 |0 (DE-627)105592722 |0 (DE-576)209739614 |a Beziehung |2 gnd |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Monitor ecclesiasticus |d Roma : Monitor Ecclesiasticus, 1949 |g 132(2017), 1, Seite 265-286 |w (DE-627)166751383 |w (DE-600)301017-X |w (DE-576)015185443 |x 0026-976X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:132 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:265-286 |
| 935 | |a DAKR | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 358353803X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1688970843 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200130163925 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-3 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Auditing,Appellate procedure,Audit,Authority,Authority,Authority in art,Judgment,Power of judgment,Relationship,Relationship,Connection |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Autorité,Autorité,Autorité (psychologie),Contrôle,Révision,Cassation,Cassation,Audit (économie),Audit,Faculté de juger,Jugement,Jugement,Relation,Relation |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Auditoría,Revisión,Autoridad,Autoridad,Capacidad de juzgar,Relación,Relación,Relacionamiento,Relacionamiento |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Autorità,Autorità,Facoltà di giudizio,Giudizio (filosofia),Giudizio,Relazione,Relazione,Revisione,Revisione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 关系,判断力,洞察力,审计,复审,复审程序,查账,权威 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 判斷力,洞察力,審計,復審,復審程序,查賬,權威,關係 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Auditoria,Revisão,Autoridade,Autoridade,Capacidade de juízo,Relação,Relação,Relacionamento,Relacionamento |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Авторитет (мотив),Авторитет,Отношения (мотив),Отношения,Ревизия (экономика),Обжалование,Сила приговора |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Έλεγχος (οικονομία),Αναίρεση,Εξουσία (μοτίβο),Εξουσία,Κριτική ικανότητα (φιλοσοφία),Σχέση (μοτίβο),Σχέση |
| SUB | |a CAN | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Auditing,Rechnungsprüfung,Betriebliche Prüfung,Betriebliches Prüfungswesen,Betriebswirtschaftliches Prüfungswesen,Prüfungswesen,Unternehmen,Betriebsprüfung,Audit,Auditierung,Revisionsverfahren , Wechselbeziehung,Beziehungen |