The Reformers as fathers of the church: Luther and Calvin in the thought of Karl Barth

Karl Barth's understanding of Luther and Calvin is not best illumined by an examination of his direct citation of their work, but by a consideration of his description of their vocation as church fathers as outlined in Church Dogmatics, I/2, a position held with remarkable consistency over the...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Bender, Kimlyn J. 1969- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press [2019]
Dans: Scottish journal of theology
Année: 2019, Volume: 72, Numéro: 4, Pages: 414-431
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Luther, Martin 1483-1546 / Calvin, Jean 1509-1564 / Réception <scientifique> / Barth, Karl 1886-1968 / Pères de l'Église / Autorité
Classifications IxTheo:KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KDD Église protestante
NBN Ecclésiologie
Sujets non-standardisés:B Karl Barth
B John Calvin
B Martin Luther
B Church Fathers
B Church History
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Karl Barth's understanding of Luther and Calvin is not best illumined by an examination of his direct citation of their work, but by a consideration of his description of their vocation as church fathers as outlined in Church Dogmatics, I/2, a position held with remarkable consistency over the course of his career. Barth's discussion of Luther and Calvin there not only sets forth his understanding of the Reformers in a historical genealogy of revelation and its witnesses, but places them in an ordering of church authorities. Moreover, his description of their unique vocation sheds important light upon his understanding of the modern discipline of church history itself. His treatment of the Reformers thus both exemplifies and follows from his conviction that church history is not an independent theological discipline but can only accompany the central disciplines of exegetical, dogmatic and practical theology.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contient:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930619000620