Doxastic Involuntarism and Evidentialism: A Curious Modern Conjunction
It is a curious feature of early modern (specifically empiricist) epistemology and its contemporary heirs in analytic philosophy that belief is held both to be involuntary (doxastic involuntarism), and to be subject to a prescriptive norm of evidence (evidentialism). I begin by laying out these thes...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
[2017]
|
| In: |
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Year: 2017, Volume: 91, Pages: 81-92 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CB Christian life; spirituality KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history VA Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
BELIEF & doubt
B EVIDENTIALISM B analytic philosophy B Faith B theory of knowledge |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1687950172 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200121115126.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200121s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/acpaproc201982883 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1687950172 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1687950172 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gamache, Joseph |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Doxastic Involuntarism and Evidentialism |b A Curious Modern Conjunction |c Joseph Gamache |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It is a curious feature of early modern (specifically empiricist) epistemology and its contemporary heirs in analytic philosophy that belief is held both to be involuntary (doxastic involuntarism), and to be subject to a prescriptive norm of evidence (evidentialism). I begin by laying out these theses, pointing out the tension that exists between them, as well as discussing how they put pressure on religious faith. I then ask why the first thesis—doxastic involuntarism—has come to be so dominant. Following my diagnosis, I advance reasons to think that the thin concept of belief presupposed by doxastic involuntarism is not faithful to our ordinary and more substantial concept of belief. I conclude by outlining an alternative understanding of what it means to believe that p, based on insights of St. Thomas Aquinas and Gabriel Marcel regarding belief and opinion, as well as the relationship between persons and their beliefs. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a analytic philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a BELIEF & doubt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EVIDENTIALISM | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Faith | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theory of knowledge | |
| 652 | |a CB:KAE:KAJ:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Catholic Philosophical Association |t Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |d Washington, DC : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1926 |g 91(2017), Seite 81-92 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376274395 |w (DE-600)2130243-1 |w (DE-576)443083517 |x 2153-7925 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:91 |g year:2017 |g pages:81-92 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpaproc201982883 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3577820209 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1687950172 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200311092535 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043768 |a CB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044462 |a KAE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044640 |a KAJ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||