Adam and Eve's Origin According to Islam: A Response to Daud Abdul-Fattah Batchelor

Due to his Muslim belief, D.A.-F. Batchelor wants to confirm and harmonize the Qur'anic reports of the origin of Adam and Eve with paleolithic and embryological statements. Batchelor quite often cites Muslim references. Thereby he provides a view of embryology which in part does not correspond...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theology and science
Main Author: Wiegrebe, Wolfgang 1932- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2019]
In: Theology and science
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
BJ Islam
NBD Doctrine of Creation
Further subjects:B Adam and Eve: monozygotic twins
B divine spirit in evolution of mankind
B creation in Paradise / earth
B Y-chromosome Adam
B Adam's origin
B Turner and Klinefelter syndromes
B mitochondrial Eve
B contemporary exegesis / Qu'ram verbatim
B contradiction to today's science
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1687924465
003 DE-627
005 20200130131431.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200121s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/14746700.2019.1670946  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1687924465 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1687924465 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)105666742  |0 (DE-627)552662801  |0 (DE-576)180510150  |4 aut  |a Wiegrebe, Wolfgang  |d 1932- 
109 |a Wiegrebe, Wolfgang 1932- 
245 1 0 |a Adam and Eve's Origin According to Islam  |b A Response to Daud Abdul-Fattah Batchelor  |c Wolfgang Wiegrebe 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Due to his Muslim belief, D.A.-F. Batchelor wants to confirm and harmonize the Qur'anic reports of the origin of Adam and Eve with paleolithic and embryological statements. Batchelor quite often cites Muslim references. Thereby he provides a view of embryology which in part does not correspond to common scientific understanding. Some of his points and arguments are well taken, but not all of them. Thus I compare Batchelor's position with these assumptions without delving into his theological considerations.\u2014I would recommend to read my response parallel to Batchelor's paper. In order compare my points with Batchelor's results I follow his sub-headings, although there are some inevitable overlaps in our respective texts. 
650 4 |a Adam and Eve: monozygotic twins 
650 4 |a Adam's origin 
650 4 |a Qu'ram verbatim / contemporary exegesis 
650 4 |a Turner and Klinefelter syndromes 
650 4 |a Y-chromosome Adam 
650 4 |a contradiction to today's science 
650 4 |a creation in Paradise / earth 
650 4 |a divine spirit in evolution of mankind 
650 4 |a mitochondrial Eve 
652 |a AB:BJ:NBD 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Theology and science  |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003  |g 17(2019), 4, Seite 455-468  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372546447  |w (DE-600)2124364-5  |w (DE-576)261325019  |x 1474-6719  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2019  |g number:4  |g pages:455-468 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2019.1670946  |x Resolving-System 
936 u w |d 17  |j 2019  |e 4  |h 455-468 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3577756195 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1687924465 
LOK |0 005 20200130131431 
LOK |0 008 200121||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043539  |a BJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051531  |a NBD 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL