Moral Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence
This paper sketches a general account of how to respond in an epistemically rational way to moral disagreement. Roughly, the account states that when two parties, A and B, disagree as to whether p, A says p while B says not-p, this is higher-order evidence that A has made a cognitive error on the fi...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2019]
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2019, Volume: 22, Issue: 5, Pages: 1103-1120 |
Further subjects: | B
Conciliationism
B Steadfastness B Moral Disagreement B Disagreement B Equal weigh view B Higher-order evidence |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |