‘'Mediated Immediacy' in the Thought of John E. Smith: A Critique1

When trying to understand the nature of religious experience as ‘mediated immediacy' I am reminded of Professor J. N. Findlay's description of Hegel's thought as a kind of ‘philosophical Buchenwald' specialising in intellectual tortures. Nevertheless, recent literature on the sub...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Londis, James J. 1938- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1975]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1975, Volume: 11, Issue: 4, Pages: 473-480
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686718845
003 DE-627
005 20200109152337.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200108s1975 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0034412500008799  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686718845 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686718845 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1147178674  |0 (DE-627)1008538515  |0 (DE-576)421109297  |4 aut  |a Londis, James J.  |d 1938- 
109 |a Londis, James J. 1938-  |a Londis, James 1938- 
245 1 0 |a ‘'Mediated Immediacy' in the Thought of John E. Smith  |b A Critique1  |c James J. Londis 
264 1 |c [1975] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When trying to understand the nature of religious experience as ‘mediated immediacy' I am reminded of Professor J. N. Findlay's description of Hegel's thought as a kind of ‘philosophical Buchenwald' specialising in intellectual tortures. Nevertheless, recent literature on the subject of religious experience reveals an increasing number of thinkers expressing confidence in the viability of this notion, John E. Smith of Yale being the most outstanding. This is not to say that all the thinkers categorised by ‘mediated immediacy' have no important differences. They do. Infact, Smith might not even accept the phrase as accurately describing his position, despite the fact that J.B. Stearns applied it to his thought in a recent article. 
601 |a Smith, John 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 11(1975), 4, Seite 473-480  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:1975  |g number:4  |g pages:473-480 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/mediated-immediacy-in-the-thought-of-john-e-smith-a-critique1/77D0EC27468B0718D09AC0D8130E02A7  |x Resolving-System 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008799  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3573423825 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686718845 
LOK |0 005 20200108160848 
LOK |0 008 200108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL