Religious Obedience and Moral Autonomy
It has become fashionable to try to prove the impossibility of there being a God. Findlay's celebrated ontological disproof has in the past quarter century given rise to vigorous controversy. More recently James Rachels has offered a moral argument intended to show that there could not be a bei...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1975]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1975, Volume: 11, Issue: 3, Pages: 265-281 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686718675 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200108160841.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200108s1975 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500008416 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686718675 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686718675 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)131963236 |0 (DE-627)516321110 |0 (DE-576)162637772 |4 aut |a Quinn, Philip L. |d 1940-2004 | |
| 109 | |a Quinn, Philip L. 1940-2004 |a Quinn, Philip 1940-2004 |a Quinn, Philip L. Philosophieprofessor 1940-2004 |a Quinn, Philip Philosophieprofessor 1940-2004 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Religious Obedience and Moral Autonomy |c Philip L. Quinn |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1975] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It has become fashionable to try to prove the impossibility of there being a God. Findlay's celebrated ontological disproof has in the past quarter century given rise to vigorous controversy. More recently James Rachels has offered a moral argument intended to show that there could not be a being worthy of worship. In this paper I shall examine the position Rachels is arguing for in some detail. I shall endeavor to show that his argument is unsound and, more interestingly, that the genuine philosophical perplexity which motivates it can be dispelled without too much difficulty. | ||
| 601 | |a Autonomie | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 11(1975), 3, Seite 265-281 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:1975 |g number:3 |g pages:265-281 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/religious-obedience-and-moral-autonomy/876B74CEA7C924F8489B704E90622768 |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008416 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 11 |j 1975 |e 3 |h 265-281 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3573423620 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686718675 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200108160841 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||