The Argument from Design - a Defence
Mr Olding's recent attack on my exposition of the argument from design gives me an opportunity to defend the central theses of my original article. My article pointed out that there were arguments from design of two types—those which take as their premisses regularities of copresence (spatial o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1972]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1972, Volume: 8, Issue: 3, Pages: 193-205 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686651457 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409150513.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200108s1972 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500005874 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686651457 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686651457 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)119213877 |0 (DE-627)080012256 |0 (DE-576)163254524 |4 aut |a Swinburne, Richard |d 1934- | |
| 109 | |a Swinburne, Richard 1934- |a Granville Swinburne, Richard 1934- |a Swinburne, R. G. 1934- |a Swinburne, Richard G. 1934- |a Swinburne, Richard Granville 1934- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Argument from Design - a Defence |c R. G. Swinburne |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1972] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Mr Olding's recent attack on my exposition of the argument from design gives me an opportunity to defend the central theses of my original article. My article pointed out that there were arguments from design of two types—those which take as their premisses regularities of copresence (spatial order) and those which take as their premisses regularities of succession (temporal order). I sought to defend an argument of the second type. One merit of such an argument is that there is no doubt about the truth of its premisses. Almost all objects in the world behave in a highly regular way describable by scientific laws. Further, any scientific explanation of such a regularity must invoke some more general regularity. (We explain the gas laws by Newton's laws.) The most general regularities of all are, as such, scientifically inexplicable. The question arises whether there is a possible explanation of another kind which can be provided for them, and whether their occurrence gives any or much support to that explanation. I urged that we do explain some phenomena by explanation of an entirely different kind from the scientific. We explain states of affairs by the action of agents who bring them about intentionally of their own choice. Regularities of succession, as well as other phenomena may be explained in this way. Explanation of this kind I will term intentional explanation. Intentional explanation of some phenomenon E consists in adducing an agent A who brought E about of his own choice and a further end G which, he believed, would be forwarded by the production of E. (When an agent brings about E for its own sake', E will be the same as G.) | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 8(1972), 3, Seite 193-205 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:1972 |g number:3 |g pages:193-205 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Olding, Alan, 1937 - |t The Argument from Design - a Reply to R. G. Swinburne |d 1971 |w (DE-627)1686522096 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Olding, Alan, 1937 - |t Design - A Further Reply to R. G. Swinburne |d 1973 |w (DE-627)1686651767 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/argument-from-designa-defence/AAD0639063B49AEA4DD521518C1E9460 |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500005874 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3573282067 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686651457 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200108090800 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||