Miracles and Epistemology
The writing of yet another paper on miracles probably stands in need of justification. The justification I wish to claim has two aspects. Firstly, I think that the concepts of the miraculous usually defended and, in turn, criticized, are unacceptable and that a better one is available. Secondly, and...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1972]
|
| Em: |
Religious studies
Ano: 1972, Volume: 8, Número: 2, Páginas: 115-126 |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | The writing of yet another paper on miracles probably stands in need of justification. The justification I wish to claim has two aspects. Firstly, I think that the concepts of the miraculous usually defended and, in turn, criticized, are unacceptable and that a better one is available. Secondly, and more importantly, I think that these unacceptable concepts produce in virtue of their inherent weaknesses a situation in which only the less important questions get asked about miracles. These questions are those which relate to the ontological status of miracles. I think it can be shown that is is the epistemological questions about miracles which are more interesting and important and, furthermore, that the standard accounts are so hemmed in by the difficulties raised for them that a preoccupation with ontological questions characterizes most discussion. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Mr Young on Miracles (1974)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500005631 |