Comments on Meynell's Paper
The key points in Meynell's argument seem to me to be as follows: (1) It is logically absurd to say of an action or of a state of affairs that it is good unless at least some or other of the qualities w, x, y, z, etc. (e.g. being socially approved or being productive of happiness) are present....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1969]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1969, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 155-160 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1686160542 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409150404.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191220s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500004169 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1686160542 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1686160542 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)134051424 |0 (DE-627)559887965 |0 (DE-576)162239637 |4 aut |a Miles, Thomas R. |d 1923-2008 | |
| 109 | |a Miles, Thomas R. 1923-2008 |a Miles, T. R. 1923-2008 |a Miles, Tim R. 1923-2008 |a Miles, Thomas Richard 1923-2008 |a Miles, Tim 1923-2008 |a Miles, T.R. 1923-2008 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comments on Meynell's Paper |c T. R. Miles |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1969] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The key points in Meynell's argument seem to me to be as follows: (1) It is logically absurd to say of an action or of a state of affairs that it is good unless at least some or other of the qualities w, x, y, z, etc. (e.g. being socially approved or being productive of happiness) are present. Similarly it is logically absurd to talk of human flourishing unless some or other specifiable features are present in a person's life. (2) The Heimler questionnaire shows us the sorts of ways in which the notion of human flourishing might be unpacked', viz, in terms of satisfaction through friendship, etc. I am in full agreement with him over (1) and I shall simply add some further comments on the notion of evaluating'; but as far as (2) is concerned I shall voice some doubts and reservations. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 5(1969), 2, Seite 155-160 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:1969 |g number:2 |g pages:155-160 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Meynell, Hugo Anthony, 1936 - |t On the Scope of Moral Inquiry |d 1969 |w (DE-627)1686160534 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Meynell, Hugo Anthony, 1936 - |t Reply to Professor Miles |d 1969 |w (DE-627)1686160550 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/comments-on-meynells-paper/7FBF6F78AE942F74293029C12D4757D0 |x Resolving-System |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500004169 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3567726072 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1686160542 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191220114036 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||