The Falsification Challenge: A Comment

In the last section of his article Professor Kellenberger says that Professor Flew misunderstands the nature of religious utterances. These are affirmations of belief or trust, whereas Flew treats them as if they were hypotheses. If ‘God loves us' is held by someone as an hypothesis then it wou...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McPherson, Thomas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1969]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1969, Volume: 5, Issue: 1, Pages: 81-84
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1686160461
003 DE-627
005 20240409150337.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 191220s1969 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S003441250000398X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1686160461 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1686160461 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1201918111  |0 (DE-627)1686262337  |4 aut  |a McPherson, Thomas 
109 |a McPherson, Thomas  |a Mc Pherson, Thomas  |a Mac Pherson, Thomas  |a MacPherson, Thomas 
245 1 4 |a The Falsification Challenge  |b A Comment  |c Thomas McPherson 
264 1 |c [1969] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the last section of his article Professor Kellenberger says that Professor Flew misunderstands the nature of religious utterances. These are affirmations of belief or trust, whereas Flew treats them as if they were hypotheses. If ‘God loves us' is held by someone as an hypothesis then it would be proper to ask what justifies him in holding it, and, equally, what would have to happen for him to feel that he could no longer justifiably hold it. But if ‘God loves us' is said by someone as an affirmation of trust such questions seem out of place. 
601 |a Challenger 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religious studies  |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965  |g 5(1969), 1, Seite 81-84  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785405  |w (DE-600)1466479-3  |w (DE-576)079718671  |x 1469-901X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:1969  |g number:1  |g pages:81-84 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Kellenberger, James, 1938 -   |t The Falsification Challenge  |d 1969  |w (DE-627)1686160445 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Flew, Antony, 1923 - 2010  |t The Falsification Response  |d 1969  |w (DE-627)1686160453 
787 0 8 |i Kritik in  |a Kellenberger, James, 1938 -   |t More on the Falsification Challenge  |d 1969  |w (DE-627)168616064X 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/falsification-challenge-a-comment/2D06F2E34E4ED0F1FEEF02D874D425A7  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S003441250000398X  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3567725998 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1686160461 
LOK |0 005 20191220114033 
LOK |0 008 191220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL