Is Existence a Predicate in Anselm's Argument?
One of the most annoying things to many a student of St Anselm's Proslogion is the way in which many philosophers assume that they can make Anselm's argument disappear simply by uttering the incantation, Existence is not a predicate'. Some recent studies of the argument1 have tried t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[1966]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1966, Volume: 2, Issue: 1, Pages: 121-127 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 168608840X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409150133.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 191219s1966 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412500002638 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)168608840X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP168608840X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1201853540 |0 (DE-627)1686096453 |0 (DE-576)16812596X |4 aut |a Lochhead, David |d 1936-1999 | |
| 109 | |a Lochhead, David 1936-1999 |a Lochhead, David Morgan 1936-1999 |a Lochhead, David M. 1936-1999 |a Lochhead, D. M. 1936-1999 |a Morgan Lochhead, David 1936-1999 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Existence a Predicate in Anselm's Argument? |c David M. Lochhead |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1966] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a One of the most annoying things to many a student of St Anselm's Proslogion is the way in which many philosophers assume that they can make Anselm's argument disappear simply by uttering the incantation, Existence is not a predicate'. Some recent studies of the argument1 have tried to rescue it from Kant's dictum by showing that this criticism does not apply to Anselm's so-called second' ontological argument. This argument appears in chapter III of Proslogion and depends on a distinction between necessary existence' and contingent existence'. Both Malcolm and Hartshorne are content, however, to let the better known first' argument (Proslogion, chapter II) rest in the oblivion to which Kant assigned it. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 2(1966), 1, Seite 121-127 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:1966 |g number:1 |g pages:121-127 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/is-existence-a-predicate-in-anselms-argument/B4BE9132C90972E09A5E1874ADF0A65B |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500002638 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3567215752 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 168608840X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20191219151601 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 191219||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||