The Cited Documents of Ezra-Nehemiah: Does Their Authenticity Matter?
Determining the authenticity of Ezra-Nehemiah's sources was a central question among scholars more than a century ago and remains so today. In this article, I explore why posing questions of authenticity about the source documents endures as a mainstay of Ezra-Nehemiah scholarship and argue tha...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado em: |
[2019]
|
Em: |
Biblical interpretation
Ano: 2019, Volume: 27, Número: 3, Páginas: 372-389 |
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Bibel. Esra
/ Bibel. Nehemia
/ Bibel. Esra 4
/ Autenticidade
/ Crítica das fontes
/ Crítica literária
/ Método histórico-crítico
/ Torrey, Charles Cutler 1863-1956
|
Classificações IxTheo: | HB Antigo Testamento |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
Authenticity
B C.C. Torrey B Literary Criticism B Ezra-Nehemiah B Historical Criticism B source documents |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Resumo: | Determining the authenticity of Ezra-Nehemiah's sources was a central question among scholars more than a century ago and remains so today. In this article, I explore why posing questions of authenticity about the source documents endures as a mainstay of Ezra-Nehemiah scholarship and argue that the implications of the authenticity question are frequently overstated. This overstatement reveals a prevailing scholarly instinct to separate "the real" from "the ideological," a dichotomy traceable since C.C. Torrey's Ezra Studies. Using Ezra 4 as an example, I argue that determining the authenticity of Ezra-Nehemiah's source documents is not a worthy litmus test of historical-critical scholarship. Instead, considering how Ezra 4 resembles a space of collection rather than a linear story collapses methodological boundaries, calling into question the usefulness of categories like authenticity and fabrication in our understanding of Ezra-Nehemiah and beyond. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1568-5152 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Biblical interpretation
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685152-00273P04 |