The date of building 338 at Megiddo: additional comments
Recently Kleiman and Finkelstein (2016) published their response to my rejoinder (Ussishkin 2017) regarding the date of Building 338 in Megiddo. I continue to maintain my view that Building 338 should be assigned to Stratum VA–IVB, and present here several comments referring to the response of Kleim...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2018
|
In: |
Israel exploration journal
Year: 2018, Volume: 68, Issue: 2, Pages: 232-236 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Megiddo
/ Building
/ Commentary
/ Archaeology
/ Israel
|
IxTheo Classification: | HH Archaeology |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | Recently Kleiman and Finkelstein (2016) published their response to my rejoinder (Ussishkin 2017) regarding the date of Building 338 in Megiddo. I continue to maintain my view that Building 338 should be assigned to Stratum VA–IVB, and present here several comments referring to the response of Kleiman and Finkelstein. |
---|---|
Physical Description: | Illustrationen |
ISSN: | 0021-2059 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Israel exploration journal
|