1 Gospel, 4 Acts: Introduction (s) to the Genuis of Luke
Scholars today are less convinced than they used to be about the narrative and theological unity of the Third Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. Recent statistical research urges that the two books be no longer attributed to a common author. Placing the prologue to Luke, which does command univers...
| Published in: | The Evangelical quarterly |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2018
|
| In: |
The Evangelical quarterly
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Recitations B Luke B Third Gospel B Bible. Luke B Bible Translation B PROLOGUES & epilogues B authorial unity B Recitation B Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles B Prologue B Narratives B Narrative B Apocryphal Gospels B Acts of the Apostles |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Scholars today are less convinced than they used to be about the narrative and theological unity of the Third Gospel and the Acts of the Apostles. Recent statistical research urges that the two books be no longer attributed to a common author. Placing the prologue to Luke, which does command universal acceptance, in the context of what we know about literary recitations in the first century AD, this essay uncovers the outline of a compositional framework to both Gospel and Acts from which striking evidence of a unified authorial strategy begins to emerge. Related questions of Bible translation are considered. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2772-5472 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The Evangelical quarterly
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/27725472-08901001 |