As Big as a Universe: Johannes Kepler on the Immensities of Stars and of Divine Power

Johannes Kepler accepted Tycho Brahe's claim that the Copernican hypothesis required all stars to be giant, something Brahe found absurd. Kepler argued in his De Stella Nova that some stars were larger than Brahe's size for the entire universe. He also used the issue of star sizes to argue...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
發表在:The catholic historical review
主要作者: Graney, Christopher M. 1966- (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
載入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: The Catholic University of America Press 2019
In: The catholic historical review
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Kepler, Johannes 1571-1630 / Brahe, Tycho 1546-1601 / 日心說 / / Größe / / 權力
IxTheo Classification:CF Christianity and Science
KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B heliocentrism
B Francesco Ingoli
B Giordano Bruno
B Sun
B Brahe, Tycho, 1546-1601
B Astronomy; Religious aspects
B Copernicus
B Heliocentric model (Astronomy)
B Ingoli, Francesco, 1578-1649
B Tyco Brahe
B Johannes Kepler
B Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600
B Kepler, Johannes, 1571-1630
B star size argument
在線閱讀: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
實物特徵
總結:Johannes Kepler accepted Tycho Brahe's claim that the Copernican hypothesis required all stars to be giant, something Brahe found absurd. Kepler argued in his De Stella Nova that some stars were larger than Brahe's size for the entire universe. He also used the issue of star sizes to argue against Giordano Bruno's infinite universe. Kepler's acceptance of Brahe's ideas on star sizes appears in a variety of his writings, including his response to the anti-Copernican essay by Msgr. Francesco Ingoli that cited the star size issue, an essay Galileo had felt was influential in the rejection of the Copernican hypothesis by authorities in Rome in 1616. Kepler's writings illustrate how certain supporters of Copernicus viewed the universe of stars and relied on divine power to undergird that view. Decades after Kepler, the discovery that the star size problem rested on a formerly unrecognized optical effect both freed the Copernican hypothesis from Brahe's charge of absurdity and negated Kepler's argument against Bruno.
ISSN:1534-0708
Contains:Enthalten in: The catholic historical review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/cat.2019.0045