As Big as a Universe: Johannes Kepler on the Immensities of Stars and of Divine Power
Johannes Kepler accepted Tycho Brahe's claim that the Copernican hypothesis required all stars to be giant, something Brahe found absurd. Kepler argued in his De Stella Nova that some stars were larger than Brahe's size for the entire universe. He also used the issue of star sizes to argue...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
The Catholic University of America Press
2019
|
В: |
The catholic historical review
Год: 2019, Том: 105, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 75-90 |
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Kepler, Johannes 1571-1630
/ Brahe, Tycho 1546-1601
/ Гелиоцентрическая система
/ Звезда (мотив)
/ Размер
/ Бог (мотив)
/ Власть (мотив)
|
Индексация IxTheo: | CF Христианство и наука KAH Новое время NBC Бог |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
heliocentrism
B Francesco Ingoli B Giordano Bruno B Sun B Brahe, Tycho, 1546-1601 B Astronomy; Religious aspects B Copernicus B Heliocentric model (Astronomy) B Ingoli, Francesco, 1578-1649 B Tyco Brahe B Johannes Kepler B Bruno, Giordano, 1548-1600 B Kepler, Johannes, 1571-1630 B star size argument |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Итог: | Johannes Kepler accepted Tycho Brahe's claim that the Copernican hypothesis required all stars to be giant, something Brahe found absurd. Kepler argued in his De Stella Nova that some stars were larger than Brahe's size for the entire universe. He also used the issue of star sizes to argue against Giordano Bruno's infinite universe. Kepler's acceptance of Brahe's ideas on star sizes appears in a variety of his writings, including his response to the anti-Copernican essay by Msgr. Francesco Ingoli that cited the star size issue, an essay Galileo had felt was influential in the rejection of the Copernican hypothesis by authorities in Rome in 1616. Kepler's writings illustrate how certain supporters of Copernicus viewed the universe of stars and relied on divine power to undergird that view. Decades after Kepler, the discovery that the star size problem rested on a formerly unrecognized optical effect both freed the Copernican hypothesis from Brahe's charge of absurdity and negated Kepler's argument against Bruno. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1534-0708 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: The catholic historical review
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/cat.2019.0045 |