Responding to N.T. Wright's Rejection of the Soul
At a 2011 meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers, N. T. Wright offered four reasons for rejecting the existence of soul. This was surprising, as many Christian philosophers had previously taken Wright's defense of a disembodied intermediate state as a defense of a substance dualist vi...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2018]
|
| Em: |
Heythrop journal
Ano: 2018, Volume: 59, Número: 2, Páginas: 201-220 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | HC Novo Testamento KAJ Época contemporânea NBE Antropologia NBQ Escatologia VA Filosofia |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Resumo: | At a 2011 meeting of the Society of Christian Philosophers, N. T. Wright offered four reasons for rejecting the existence of soul. This was surprising, as many Christian philosophers had previously taken Wright's defense of a disembodied intermediate state as a defense of a substance dualist view of the soul. In this paper, I offer responses to each of Wright's objections, demonstrating that Wright's arguments fail to undermine substance dualism. In so doing, I expose how popular arguments against dualism fail, such as (1) dualism is merely an unwarranted influence of Greek culture on Christianity, and (2) substance dualism is merely a soul-of-the-gaps hypothesis. Moreover, I demonstrate that Wright himself has offered a powerful reason for adopting substance dualism in his previous works. In conclusion I offer a view that explains why the human soul needs a resurrected body. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-2265 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Heythrop journal
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/heyj.12341 |
