Foreknowledge Without Determinism
A number of philosophers and theologians have argued that if God has knowledge of future human actions then human agents cannot be free. This argument rests on the assumption that, since God is essentially omniscient, God cannot be wrong about what human agents will do. It is this assumption that I...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
[2019]
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2019, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 103-113 |
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism FA Theology NBC Doctrine of God NBE Anthropology |
| Further subjects: | B
Free Will
B Fatalism B Divine Foreknowledge B Divine Attributes |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1671596579 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200701115629.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190819s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11841-017-0623-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1671596579 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1671596579 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rockwood, Nathan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Rockwood, Nathan | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Foreknowledge Without Determinism |c Nathan Rockwood |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a A number of philosophers and theologians have argued that if God has knowledge of future human actions then human agents cannot be free. This argument rests on the assumption that, since God is essentially omniscient, God cannot be wrong about what human agents will do. It is this assumption that I challenge in this paper. My aim is to develop an interpretation of God's essential omniscience according to which God can be wrong even though God never is wrong. If this interpretation of essential omniscience is coherent, as I claim it is, then there is a logically consistent position according to which God is essentially omniscient, God foreknows what human agents will do, and yet it is possible for human agents to do otherwise. Thus, the argument for theological fatalism fails. | ||
| 601 | |a Determination | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Divine Attributes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Divine Foreknowledge | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fatalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Will | |
| 652 | |a AB:FA:NBC:NBE | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Sophia |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962 |g 58(2019), 2, Seite 103-113 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)543988392 |w (DE-600)2386792-9 |w (DE-576)271774215 |x 1873-930X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:2019 |g number:2 |g pages:103-113 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/ROCFWD.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-017-0623-8 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 58 |j 2019 |e 2 |h 103-113 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3507544229 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1671596579 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200701115629 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044020 |a FA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||