When Liberalism Is Not Enough: Political Theology after Reinhold Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas
In this paper, we are interested in extending out the dialectical models of religious ethics and political theology that Reinhold Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas began by enacting a conversation between these two theorists. We do this by presenting and critically comparing Niebuhr's and Levinas...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2019]
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2019, Volume: 10, Issue: 7, Pages: 1-18 |
Further subjects: | B
Justice
B Emmanuel Levinas B Love B Political Theology B Reinhold Niebuhr B postmodern ethics B Liberalism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | In this paper, we are interested in extending out the dialectical models of religious ethics and political theology that Reinhold Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas began by enacting a conversation between these two theorists. We do this by presenting and critically comparing Niebuhr's and Levinas's thought as concerns three key issues in moral and political theory: (1) the nature of persons, (2) the source and content of the moral ideal of love and the political ideal of justice, and (3) the impossibility and yet continued practical relevance of ideals for social life. Ultimately, we conclude that they mutually offer reasons to find hope in the face of political cynicism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel10070439 |