God and free speech: A quaker perspective on the Satanic Verses controversy
This paper offers a Quaker perspective on the issues raised for British society by the Satanic Verses controversy. It is argued that the Quaker rejection of coercive power is founded upon the story of Jesus Christ. The origins of Quaker attitudes to free speech are located in seventeenth-century Pur...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge
[1993]
|
| In: |
Islam and Christian-Muslim relations
Year: 1993, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 257-267 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1670765830 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190807165659.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 190807s1993 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/09596419308721010 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1670765830 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1670765830 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Herbert, David |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a God and free speech |b A quaker perspective on the Satanic Verses controversy |c David Herbert |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1993] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper offers a Quaker perspective on the issues raised for British society by the Satanic Verses controversy. It is argued that the Quaker rejection of coercive power is founded upon the story of Jesus Christ. The origins of Quaker attitudes to free speech are located in seventeenth-century Puritanism, arguing that Quakers share with Western secular defenders of free speech an internalization of the blasphemy taboo which issues in intolerance of anything held sacred. Furthermore, free speech rhetoric tends to ignore the power relations which sustain free speech in particular contexts. This is a neglect which, coupled with a secularized theory of race relations that ignores religious factors, renders its protagonists incapable of addressing anti-Islamic prejudice, a phenomenon illustrated from press coverage of the controversy. The implications of this argument for British society and Quakers in particular are then considered. It is argued that an extension of legislation covering incitement to racial hatred to religion is the most appropriate legal response, but the greatest need is educational. Quakers and other Christian groups need to develop their own theological response to avoid passively replicating the dominant view in society. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Islam and Christian-Muslim relations |d Abingdon : Routledge, 1990 |g 4(1993), 2, Seite 257-267 |w (DE-627)170281272 |w (DE-600)1035057-3 |w (DE-576)02311407X |x 0959-6410 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:1993 |g number:2 |g pages:257-267 |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419308721010 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3505065609 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1670765830 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190807160247 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190807||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||