Midrashic disputations in the Zohar
This article examines a series of expositions in the Zohar in which the authors dispute the exegesis given by an aggadic tradition cited in the Talmud. A close and systematic analysis of these texts indicates that, as they appear in the Zohar , the former do not derive from the original talmudic sou...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
College
[2015]
|
| In: |
Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion
Year: 2013, Volume: 84/85, Pages: 127-146 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Zohar
/ Commentary
/ Torah
/ Exegesis
/ Controversy
/ Shelomoh ben Yitsḥaḳ 1040-1105
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1670636518 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20191114155941.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 190806s2015 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1670636518 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1670636518 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1050017315 |0 (DE-627)783144253 |0 (DE-576)404282709 |4 aut |a Yiśraʾeli, ʿOded |d 1960- | |
| 109 | |a Yiśraʾeli, ʿOded 1960- |a Yisraeli, Oded 1960- |a Yiśreʾeli, ʿOded 1960- |a Israeli, Oded 1960- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Midrashic disputations in the Zohar |c Oded Yisraeli |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article examines a series of expositions in the Zohar in which the authors dispute the exegesis given by an aggadic tradition cited in the Talmud. A close and systematic analysis of these texts indicates that, as they appear in the Zohar , the former do not derive from the original talmudic source but are a later medieval reworking as represented in Rashi's commentary on the Torah. This leads to the conclusion that, at least in the cases under discussion, the Zoharic authors either did not have the talmudic texts in hand or they deliberately chose to ignore them. We thus suggest that in its exegetical exposition, the Zohar disputes with Rashi and his interpretation of the Torah in accordance with the hermeneutic discourse customary in the Middle Ages. This claim is of great significance for understanding the self-consciousness of the Zohar , in particular its attitude to rabbinic literature. | ||
| 601 | |a Midrash | ||
| 652 | |a BH | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4191011-4 |0 (DE-627)10417420X |0 (DE-576)210070625 |a Zohar |2 gnd |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4136710-8 |0 (DE-627)104500719 |0 (DE-576)209671467 |2 gnd |a Kommentar |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4226122-3 |0 (DE-627)104104767 |0 (DE-576)210311568 |2 gnd |a Thora |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015950-4 |0 (DE-627)104675314 |0 (DE-576)20891434X |2 gnd |a Exegese |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4128337-5 |0 (DE-627)105718076 |0 (DE-576)209601264 |2 gnd |a Kontroverse |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118598325 |0 (DE-627)079390714 |0 (DE-576)164572716 |2 gnd |a Shelomoh ben Yitsḥaḳ |d 1040-1105 |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion |t Hebrew Union College annual / Jewish Institute of Religion |d Cincinnati, Ohio : College, 1953 |g 84/85(2013/2014), Seite 127-146 |w (DE-627)129525642 |w (DE-600)213556-5 |w (DE-576)014944561 |x 0360-9049 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:84/85 |g year:2013/2014 |g pages:127-146 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)178658087X |k Electronic | ||
| 935 | |a BIIN | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3504271833 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1670636518 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210527094502 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190806||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 2 |b FTH Z4-278 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 8564 |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00965278 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a inzs | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043520 |a BH | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REF | |a Thorakommentar | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Commentary,Controversy,Exegesis,Torah,Thora,Zohar,Sohar,Sefer haz-Zohar,Midrash ha-zohar,Yerushalmi |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Commentaire,Controverse,Exégèse,Torah,Thora,Thora |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Comentario,Controversia,Exegesis,Torá |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Commento,Controversia,Esegesi,Torah,Torà,Torà |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 争论,争议,妥拉,托拉,注释,解释,评注,注释,诠释,解经 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 妥拉,托拉,注釋,解釋,評注,注釋,詮釋,解經,爭論,爭議 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Comentário,Controvérsia,Exegese,Torá |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Комментарий,Спорный вопрос,Тора,Экзегетика |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διαμάχη,Εξηγητική,Ερμηνευτική,Σχόλιο,Τορά |
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Sohar,Sefer haz-Zohar,Sefer ha-Zohar,Book of splendor,Midraš de-Šimʿon bar Yoḥay,Midrash Yehi Or,Midrash ha-zohar,זהר,ספר הזהר , Kommentare , Tora,Torah,Ḥamishah ḥumshe Torah,Ḥămišä hûmĕšê Tôrä,Ḥamišša humše Tora,Tawrāt Mūsā,Tevrat,Tevrīt , Bibelauslegung,Bibelexegese,Biblische Auslegung,Bibelinterpretation,Biblische Exegese,Schriftauslegung , Richtungsstreit,Kontroversen , Raschi,of Troyes,1040-1105,Ben Isaac,1040-1105,Ben-Yitsḥaḳ, Shelomoh,1040-1105,Ben-Yiṣḥāq, Šelomo,1040-1105,Jizchak, Salomon,1040-1105,Yitzahki, Chlomo,1040-1105,Yitsḥaḳi, Shelomoh,1040-1105,Salomo,Ben Isaak,1040-1105,Salomo Ben Isak,1040-1105,Salomo,Ben Isak,1040-1105,Salomo ben-Jizchak,1040-1105,Salomon,Ben Isaac,1040-1105,Salomon,Jizchaki,1040-1105,Salomon Izḥaqi,1040-1105,Shlomo ben Itsh'ak HaTsarfati,1040-1105,Salomon,Isacides,1040-1105,Salomon Jarchi,1040-1105,Schelomo,Ben Isaak,1040-1105,Schelomo Jizchakĭ,1040-1105,S̆elomoh Jiṣḥagi,1040-1105,S̆elòmò Jishāgi,1040-1105,Šelōmō Jiṣḥāqī,1040-1105,Šelōmō Ben-Jiṣḥāq,1040-1105,Solomon Ben-Isaac,1040-1105,Solomon Izhaki,1040-1105,Shlomo Izhaqi,1040-1105,Schlomo Ben Jizchak,1040-1105,Schlomoh Ben Jitz'chak,1040-1105,Salomo Jarchius,1040-1105,Salomon,Jarhius,1040-1105,Salomon,Yarchi,1040-1105,Salomon Jarchius,1040-1105,Salomon Jarhius,1040-1105,Šelōmō Jarḥī,1040-1105,Šelōmō Yarḥî,1040-1105,Salomon,Paschandatha,1040-1105,Salomo Lunotici,1040-1105,Šelomo ben Yiṣḥaq,1040-1105,Šelomo ben Yiṣḥāq,1040-1105,Shelomo Ben Yitsḥaḳ,1040-1105,Salomo Ben Isaak,1040-1105,Salomon Ben Isaak,1040-1105,Schelomo ben Isaak,1040-1105,Šelomo Ben-Yiṣḥāq,1040-1105,Shelomoh Ben-Yitsḥaḳ,1040-1105,Shelomoh Yitsḥaḳi,1040-1105,Schlomo Ben Jitzʹchak-Raschi,1040-1105,Shelomoh Yitzhaki,1040-1105,Schlomo Jizchaki,1040-1105,Šĕlōmō Ben-Yishāq,1040-1105,Šelomoh ben Jiṣḥaq,1040-1105,Schlomoh ben Jitzʹchak,1040-1105,Shlomoh ben Yitzchak,1040-1105,Shelomo ben Yitzchak,1040-1105,Salomo ben Isaak,1040-1105,Schelomo Jizchaki,1040-1105,Salomon ben Isaac,1040-1105,Shelomoh ben Yitshak,1040-1105,R.Sh.Y.,1040-1105,RaŠ"Y,1040-1105,Rašî,1040-1105,Rashi,1040-1105,Rachi,1040-1105,Raschi,1040-1105,Rašʺi,1040-1105,Raschi, Salomon bar Isaak,1040-1105,Raši, Šlomo Icchaki,1040-1105,Rachi, Chelomoh ben Isaac,1040-1105,Raschi, Salomon,1040-1105,Raschi, Salomo Ben Isaak,1040-1105,Jarchi, Solomo,1040-1105,Jarchi, Salomon,1040-1105,Jarchi, Solomon,1040-1105,Jarchi, Schelomo,1040-1105,Jarchius, Schelomo,1040-1105,Jarchius, Salomo,1040-1105,Jarchius, Salomon,1040-1105,Iarhi, Schelomo,1040-1105,Iarhi, Salomo,1040-1105,Jarchi, Salomo,1040-1105,Pseudo-Raschi,1040-1105 |