"Only a God Can Resist a God." Political Theology between Polytheism and Gnosticism

Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This art...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Publicado no:Political theology
Autor principal: Vatter, Miguel E. (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
Em: Political theology
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Blumenberg, Hans 1920-1996 / Schmitt, Carl 1888-1985 / Teologia política / Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von 1749-1832 / Napoleon, I., Frankreich, Kaiser 1769-1821 / Encontro
Classificações IxTheo:CG Cristianismo e política
KAH Idade Moderna
KAJ Época contemporânea
VA Filosofia
ZC Política geral
Outras palavras-chave:B Schmitt
B Polytheism
B Parrésia
B Blumenberg
B Goethe
B Gnosticism
B Foucault
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Descrição
Resumo:Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This article revisits Hans Blumenberg's reconstruction of the meeting between the German poet Goethe and the French emperor Napoleon as an example of a parrhesiastic encounter between philosophy and tyranny. The article situates Blumenberg's discussion of Goethe's pantheism and polytheism in the context of his ongoing polemic with Schmitt's conceptions of sovereignty and political theology. It argues that while both Blumenberg and Schmitt seek to offer responses to the Gnostic rejection of worldly power, a reading of Goethe in light of the discourse on parrhesia or frank speech lately revived by Foucault allows for the articulation of republican response to Gnosticism.
Descrição do item:Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 20, numbers 5/6, August-September 2019"
ISSN:1743-1719
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1618597