"Only a God Can Resist a God." Political Theology between Polytheism and Gnosticism

Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This art...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Pubblicato in:Political theology
Autore principale: Vatter, Miguel E. (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
In: Political theology
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Blumenberg, Hans 1920-1996 / Schmitt, Carl 1888-1985 / Teologia politica / Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von 1749-1832 / Napoleon, I., Frankreich, Kaiser 1769-1821 / Incontro
Notazioni IxTheo:CG Cristianesimo e politica
KAH Età moderna
KAJ Età contemporanea
VA Filosofia
ZC Politica generale
Altre parole chiave:B Parrhesia
B Schmitt
B Polytheism
B Blumenberg
B Goethe
B Gnosticism
B Foucault
Accesso online: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This article revisits Hans Blumenberg's reconstruction of the meeting between the German poet Goethe and the French emperor Napoleon as an example of a parrhesiastic encounter between philosophy and tyranny. The article situates Blumenberg's discussion of Goethe's pantheism and polytheism in the context of his ongoing polemic with Schmitt's conceptions of sovereignty and political theology. It argues that while both Blumenberg and Schmitt seek to offer responses to the Gnostic rejection of worldly power, a reading of Goethe in light of the discourse on parrhesia or frank speech lately revived by Foucault allows for the articulation of republican response to Gnosticism.
Descrizione del documento:Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 20, numbers 5/6, August-September 2019"
ISSN:1743-1719
Comprende:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1618597