"Only a God Can Resist a God." Political Theology between Polytheism and Gnosticism

Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This art...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Political theology
Auteur principal: Vatter, Miguel E. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group [2019]
Dans: Political theology
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Blumenberg, Hans 1920-1996 / Schmitt, Carl 1888-1985 / Théologie politique / Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von 1749-1832 / Napoleon, I., Frankreich, Kaiser 1769-1821 / Rencontre
Classifications IxTheo:CG Christianisme et politique
KAH Époque moderne
KAJ Époque contemporaine
VA Philosophie
ZC Politique en général
Sujets non-standardisés:B Schmitt
B Parrhésie
B Polytheism
B Blumenberg
B Goethe
B Gnosticism
B Foucault
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This article revisits Hans Blumenberg's reconstruction of the meeting between the German poet Goethe and the French emperor Napoleon as an example of a parrhesiastic encounter between philosophy and tyranny. The article situates Blumenberg's discussion of Goethe's pantheism and polytheism in the context of his ongoing polemic with Schmitt's conceptions of sovereignty and political theology. It argues that while both Blumenberg and Schmitt seek to offer responses to the Gnostic rejection of worldly power, a reading of Goethe in light of the discourse on parrhesia or frank speech lately revived by Foucault allows for the articulation of republican response to Gnosticism.
Description:Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 20, numbers 5/6, August-September 2019"
ISSN:1743-1719
Contient:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1618597