"Only a God Can Resist a God." Political Theology between Polytheism and Gnosticism
Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This art...
Publicado en: | Political theology |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
En: |
Political theology
|
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Blumenberg, Hans 1920-1996
/ Schmitt, Carl 1888-1985
/ Teología política
/ Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von 1749-1832
/ Napoleon, I., Frankreich, Kaiser 1769-1821
/ Encuentro
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | CG Cristianismo y política KAH Edad Moderna KAJ Época contemporánea VA Filosofía ZC Política general |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Schmitt
B Polytheism B Blumenberg B Goethe B Gnosticism B Foucault B Parresia |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Sumario: | Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This article revisits Hans Blumenberg's reconstruction of the meeting between the German poet Goethe and the French emperor Napoleon as an example of a parrhesiastic encounter between philosophy and tyranny. The article situates Blumenberg's discussion of Goethe's pantheism and polytheism in the context of his ongoing polemic with Schmitt's conceptions of sovereignty and political theology. It argues that while both Blumenberg and Schmitt seek to offer responses to the Gnostic rejection of worldly power, a reading of Goethe in light of the discourse on parrhesia or frank speech lately revived by Foucault allows for the articulation of republican response to Gnosticism. |
---|---|
Notas: | Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 20, numbers 5/6, August-September 2019" |
ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1618597 |