"Only a God Can Resist a God." Political Theology between Polytheism and Gnosticism
Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This art...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Political theology |
|---|---|
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2019]
|
| In: |
Political theology
|
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Blumenberg, Hans 1920-1996
/ Schmitt, Carl 1888-1985
/ Politische Theologie
/ Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von 1749-1832
/ Napoleon, I., Frankreich, Kaiser 1769-1821
/ Begegnung
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | CG Christentum und Politik KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit VA Philosophie ZC Politik |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Parrhesia
B Schmitt B Polytheism B Blumenberg B Goethe B Gnosticism B Foucault |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Sovereignty - based on a claim to irresistible authority - and "speaking truth to power" (or parrhesia) are evidently opposed and yet they seem to have a strange affinity with one another, at least if one follows Foucault's last lectures on this motif of political philosophy. This article revisits Hans Blumenberg's reconstruction of the meeting between the German poet Goethe and the French emperor Napoleon as an example of a parrhesiastic encounter between philosophy and tyranny. The article situates Blumenberg's discussion of Goethe's pantheism and polytheism in the context of his ongoing polemic with Schmitt's conceptions of sovereignty and political theology. It argues that while both Blumenberg and Schmitt seek to offer responses to the Gnostic rejection of worldly power, a reading of Goethe in light of the discourse on parrhesia or frank speech lately revived by Foucault allows for the articulation of republican response to Gnosticism. |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Das gedruckte Heft ist als Doppelheft erschienen: "Volume 20, numbers 5/6, August-September 2019" |
| ISSN: | 1743-1719 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Political theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2019.1618597 |