On the Persistence of the Genealogical in Contemporary Theology
There is a persistence of genealogical discourse in a certain strand of contemporary theology. Opting for the genealogical shapes the theological task of remembrance and engagement with the historical tradition in important, but also problematic, ways. In this article I discuss how genealogical disc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
In: |
Modern theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 33, Issue: 3, Pages: 434-452 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Nietzsche, Friedrich 1844-1900
/ Genealogy
/ Phenomenology
/ Philosophy of history
|
IxTheo Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NBE Anthropology VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | There is a persistence of genealogical discourse in a certain strand of contemporary theology. Opting for the genealogical shapes the theological task of remembrance and engagement with the historical tradition in important, but also problematic, ways. In this article I discuss how genealogical discourse was appropriated by theology, and then uncover its implicit assumptions and tendencies. Analysing some encounters between theological genealogies and various Hegelian thinkers, I draw a contrast between Nietzschean genealogy and Hegelian 'phenomenology'. This comparison brings to light some fundamental ways in which the genealogical might distort theological writing and practice. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1468-0025 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Modern theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/moth.12337 |