Response to Helmut Reich: Overview or Apologetic?
Reich's contribution that the Oser/Gmunder approach provides a balance for the hard-soft distinction among theories of religious thinking is critiqued in three ways. First, hard and soft categories are seen to be obsolete in light of their dated use in debates with behaviorists and maturationis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
[1993]
|
| In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1993, Volume: 3, Issue: 3, Pages: 173-179 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1669639606 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20190723143630.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 190723s1993 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0303_2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1669639606 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1669639606 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)118997645 |0 (DE-627)079780059 |0 (DE-576)164458867 |4 aut |a Fowler, James W. |d 1940-2015 | |
| 109 | |a Fowler, James W. 1940-2015 |a Fowler, James William 1940-2015 |a Fowler, James Wiley 1940-2015 |a Fowler, James 1940-2015 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Response to Helmut Reich |b Overview or Apologetic? |c James W. Fowler |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1993] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Reich's contribution that the Oser/Gmunder approach provides a balance for the hard-soft distinction among theories of religious thinking is critiqued in three ways. First, hard and soft categories are seen to be obsolete in light of their dated use in debates with behaviorists and maturationists. Second, the thesis neglects the feminist critique of constructive developmental approaches. Third, the expanded treatment of the Oser/Gmunder theory becomes an apologetic rather than an even-handed treatment. | ||
| 601 | |a Apologetik | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The international journal for the psychology of religion |d New York, NY : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1991 |g 3(1993), 3, Seite 173-179 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320614204 |w (DE-600)2021761-4 |w (DE-576)255101619 |x 1532-7582 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:1993 |g number:3 |g pages:173-179 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Reich, Karl Helmut, 1923 - |t Cognitive-Developmental Approaches to Religiousness |d 1993 |w (DE-627)1669639592 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0303_2 |x Resolving-System |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 3 |j 1993 |e 3 |h 173-179 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3495853847 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1669639606 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20190723135324 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 190723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||